| Luke Smith on Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:59:15 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: <nettime> Response to "Academe Is Complicit" essay |
I would say that concern about appropriation is valid for some posters and
certainly for things like religious images; it is not a concern I would
take seriously when it comes to academic articles.
LS
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Lincoln Cushing <lcushing@igc.org> wrote:
> Nettime colleagues:
>
> I was forwarded Timothy Burke's provocative piece through the
> Progressive Librarians Guild (I've been a member for over ten years).
> I'm replying with an adaptation of something I wrote following
> another essay examining Aaron Swartz's death. While Mr. Swartz's
> death was tragic, his persecution by the US Attorney General's office
> heavyhanded, and many of the information liberation positions he
> espoused noble, I was struck by the criticism in Burke's essay leveled
> at JSTOR.
<...>
--
Luke Smith
http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/~smith/
luke.thomas.smith@gmail.com
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org